Premium
The effect of the migration of Alosa fallax fallax (Laécpède) into fresh water, on branchial and gut parasites
Author(s) -
Aprahamian Miran W.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
journal of fish biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1095-8649
pISSN - 0022-1112
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1985.tb03199.x
Subject(s) - biology , population density , estuary , significant difference , habitat , fresh water , intermediate host , host (biology) , population , zoology , veterinary medicine , ecology , fishery , medicine , statistics , demography , mathematics , sociology
The prevalence and relative density of branchial and gut parasites taken from Almafullax in the estuary of the River Severn, at the start of the freshwater phase of its spawning migration, were compared with those taken from their spawning grounds in fresh water. Mazocrues alosue showed no significant difference in prevalence between the two habitats, though their relative density did fall significantly. Because of the direct relationship between length and relative density, this difference may be explained by the estuary samples of A. fullux being of fish significantly larger than those from fresh water. Other possible causes are discussed. The prevalence and relative density of M. alosae showed a trend to increase with age of the host. Repeat spawning A. fallax had a significantly greater relative density and prevalence of M. alosue when compared to virgin fish. Analysis of the sampled population showed that Clavellisu emarginata declined significantly in both prevalence and relative density in fresh water, and this was confined to the younger and first time spawning A. fullux. Thynnuscuris aduncum showed significant reductions in prevalence and relative density of infection in fresh water when compared to the estuarine samples. The species Hemiurus uppendiculatus and Pomphorhynchus laevis showed no significant difference in prevalence and relative density of infection, and Pronoprymna ventrzcosa no significant difference in prevalence, between the two habitats.