Premium
The population density, growth rate and production of roach Rutilus mtilus (L.) in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands
Author(s) -
Goldspink C. R.
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
journal of fish biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1095-8649
pISSN - 0022-1112
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1979.tb03632.x
Subject(s) - biology , fecundity , rutilus , zoology , population , population density , range (aeronautics) , sex ratio , fishery , ecology , fish <actinopterygii> , demography , materials science , sociology , composite material
A method of estimating the population density of roach in Tjeukemeer (21.3 km 2 ) using 20 529 introduced fin‐clipped fish is described. Fyke nets proved to be an effective method of sampling the population for marked fish during the spawning season. A total of 20 277 roach were processed during the recapturing period. The population density of roach (? 14 cm) was estimated to be 1 246 458. The growth rate of roach in the lake although relatively poor (von Bertalanffy's L ∞ for males and females, 22 and 26 cm respectively) for the species was similar to that recorded in three other Friesian lakes. The mortality rate of males was higher than that of females. Logarithmic length‐weight regression analyses showed that the value of the coefficient varied both within and between the sexes, that of females being higher (range 3.03–3.375) than that of males (range 2.76–3.254). Seasonal changes in the size of the coefficient were due to a disproportionate loss of gonad weight in larger fish. The fecundity of the population was comparatively high for the species. The total production of the population was estimated to be 95 hg ha −1 of which 39 kg ha −1 was contributed by fry. In older (? IV) fish the production of females (12 kg ha −1 ) exceeded that (2 kg ha −1 ) of males, due to differences in their growth and mortality rates. The relatively poor performance of roach in Tjeukemeer, in terms of biomass and production was due to a scarcity of zoobenthos and competition from other species offish. There is no evidence either from this study or the literature that the productive potential of roach in lakes is high, even though macrophytes and detritus can be consumed in significant amounts.