z-logo
Premium
Illiberal Libertarians: Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal View
Author(s) -
FREEMAN SAMUEL
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
philosophy and public affairs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.388
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1088-4963
pISSN - 0048-3915
DOI - 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00105.x
Subject(s) - utilitarianism , libertarianism , liberalism , interpretation (philosophy) , philosophy , law , public philosophy , democracy , social contract , sociology , law and economics , political science , politics , philosophy education , linguistics
Liberalism as a philosophical doctrine can be distinguished from liberalism as a system of social and political institutions. Philosophical liberalism maintains that, first, there is a plurality of intrinsic goods, and that no single way of life can encompass them all. There are then different ways of living worth affirming for their own sake. Second, whatever intrinsic goods are appropriate for individuals, their having the freedom to determine and pursue their conceptions of the good is essential to their living a good life. Finally, necessary to individuals’ good is that their freely adopted conceptions of the good be consistent with justice. All have an interest in exercising their freedom so as to respect others’ basic rights and other requirements of justice. While this does not mean that justice is necessarily an intrinsic good (although it can be), it does mean that observing justice’s demands is a normal precondition of living a good life. Kant, Mill, Rawls, Berlin, Dworkin, Raz, Nagel, Ackerman, Barry, and many others endorse some version of these claims. Philosophical liberalism is but one way to argue for liberal institutions, including a

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here