z-logo
Premium
A review of relationships between interspecific competition and invasions in fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Author(s) -
Duyck PierreFrancois,
David Patrice,
Quilici Serge
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
ecological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.865
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1365-2311
pISSN - 0307-6946
DOI - 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00638.x
Subject(s) - tephritidae , biology , interspecific competition , competition (biology) , ecology , context (archaeology) , bactrocera , niche , abiotic component , invasive species , pest analysis , botany , paleontology
.  1. A number of invasions in the family Tephritidae (fruit flies) have been observed worldwide despite quarantine procedures. In this review, the potential importance of interspecific competition and competitive displacement among different tephritid species is evaluated in the context of recent invasions. 2. Where polyphagous tephritid species have been introduced in areas already occupied by a polyphagous tephritid, interspecific competition has resulted in a decrease in number and niche shift of the pre‐established species. No reciprocal invasions have been observed. 3. The data on tephritid invasions seem to support a hierarchical mode of competition; however, complete exclusion usually did not occur. Indeed, tephritid distribution and abundance are markedly structured by various abiotic (mostly climatic) and biotic (host plants) factors. 4. The primary determinant of competitive interactions in near‐optimal conditions, such as lowlands with abundant fruit plantations, is probably the life‐history strategy. The r – K gradient could be used as a predictor of potential invaders, because K traits (such as large adult size) may favour both exploitation and interference competition. 5. For future research, a better understanding of competition mechanisms seems essential. Different species competing in the same area should be compared with respect to: (i) demographic parameters, (ii) the outcome of experimental co‐infestations on the same fruit, and (iii) behavioural and chemical interference mechanisms.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here