z-logo
Premium
On the diagnosis of erythrodermic cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma
Author(s) -
Vonderheid Eric C.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of cutaneous pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1600-0560
pISSN - 0303-6987
DOI - 10.1111/j.0303-6987.2006.00541.x
Subject(s) - erythroderma , mycosis fungoides , pathology , medicine , cutaneous t cell lymphoma , clone (java method) , lymphoma , skin biopsy , immunohistochemistry , lymph node , peripheral t cell lymphoma , lymph node biopsy , dermatology , biopsy , t cell , biology , immunology , immune system , dna , genetics
  Erythrodermic cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (E‐CTCL) is the cause of less than 5% of all cases of generalized erythroderma. A methodical evaluation of skin, blood, and lymph node samples using standard histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry (FC), and molecular analysis for evidence of a dominant T‐cell clone has been recommended in a recently published diagnostic algorithm. In this commentary, the author discusses available information regarding the role of these diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of E‐CTCL with emphasis on personal observations regarding skin IHC and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐based molecular studies as adjunct diagnostic studies on a series of 55 patients with erythrodermic mycosis fungoides and 50 patients with Sézary syndrome compared to 50 patients with extensive benign inflammatory skin disease. The conclusions are (1) IHC of the skin does not reliably differentiate E‐CTCL from benign simulants, (2) presence of phenotypically abnormal T cells in the blood or expanded subsets of CD4 + CD7 – or CD4 + CD26 – cells by FC is particularly helpful as a diagnostic study, (3) the presence of an identical T‐cell clone in the skin and blood also is a specific diagnostic criterion for E‐CTCL, but exceptions may occur, and (4) the PCRγ‐denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis technique appears to be more reliable than PCRγ‐single‐stranded conformational polymorphism for diagnostic purposes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here