Premium
The Ups and Downs of State Budget Process Reform: Experience of Three Decades
Author(s) -
Burns Robert C.,
Lee Robert D.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
public budgeting and finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.694
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1540-5850
pISSN - 0275-1100
DOI - 10.1111/j.0275-1100.2004.02403001.x
Subject(s) - unison , state (computer science) , budget process , government (linguistics) , economics , accounting , process (computing) , federal budget , business , finance , political science , fiscal year , politics , computer science , law , linguistics , philosophy , physics , algorithm , acoustics , operating system
From zero‐base budgeting to the Government Performance and Results Act, state budgeting systems have been synonymous with budgeting reform for over 30 years. This article examines the trends, both long‐term and short‐term, which have been identified through analysis of state budgeting office practices. Particular emphasis has been placed on understanding the changes in performance measurement over the period of 1970 to 2000. The findings reveal trends such as changes in the makeup of budget office personnel, a lack of budget offices in moving toward cost accounting, and trends in budget preparation and budget documents. Some budget reforms seem to have plateaued, beginning in the mid‐1990s, while other reforms have exhibited “backsliding.” It is clear that the states are not all marching in unison in reforming their budget systems. As with earlier phases of this study, the 2000 data raise many questions that will be explored in future research.