z-logo
Premium
Nutrient resorption of wetland graminoids is related to the type of nutrient limitation
Author(s) -
GÜSEWELL S.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
functional ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.272
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2435
pISSN - 0269-8463
DOI - 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00967.x
Subject(s) - nutrient , biology , graminoid , wetland , phosphorus , dominance (genetics) , ecology , botany , zoology , agronomy , forb , grassland , chemistry , biochemistry , organic chemistry , gene
Summary1 Nitrogen or phosphorus limits plant growth in many wetlands. If specific mechanisms reducing losses of the growth‐limiting nutrient have been favoured by selection, the N and P resorption efficiency (RE) during leaf senescence (NRE, PRE: the fraction of N or P resorbed) might depend on the type of nutrient limitation. 2 The size, mass, and N and P concentrations of green and senesced leaves were determined for 10 graminoid species at Dutch and Swiss wetland sites, with N : P ratios in leaves (6–27 by mass) indicating N or P limitation. 3 During senescence, leaf area decreased by 8–19%, and leaf mass by 8–38%; NRE ranged from 0 to 87%, and PRE from 30 to 96%. PRE correlated strongly with NRE ( r  = 0·91) but was, on average, 17% higher. Within the Swiss or Dutch sites, NRE and PRE did not correlate with foliar N : P ratios, indicating that RE was not directly adjusted to the type of nutrient limitation. 4 NRE and PRE were, on average, higher at the P‐limited Swiss sites than at the N‐limited Dutch sites. Because PRE exceeded NRE, high RE would be most beneficial when P limits plant growth. This may have contributed to the dominance of graminoids with high RE in P‐limited wetlands.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here