Premium
Performance Measurement Versus City Service Satisfaction: Intra‐City Variations in Quality? *
Author(s) -
Swindell David,
Kelly Janet
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
social science quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.482
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1540-6237
pISSN - 0038-4941
DOI - 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00325.x
Subject(s) - service (business) , service quality , variation (astronomy) , resource (disambiguation) , quality (philosophy) , resource distribution , level of service , order (exchange) , quality of service , resource allocation , business , sample (material) , psychology , marketing , economics , computer science , transport engineering , engineering , telecommunications , market economy , philosophy , physics , epistemology , finance , astrophysics , chemistry , chromatography , computer network
Objective. This article illustrates the usefulness of citizen satisfaction surveys to account for variation in citizen satisfaction with public‐service quality within a city's boundaries. Methods. The article examines data from 17 local governments and divided into 141 spatial areas to investigate the distribution of satisfaction within cities (as an outcome measure) and the effect of SES variables on variation in satisfaction with jointly consumed services. Results. Satisfaction varies within cities, not all of which is attributable to SES characteristics. This suggests substantive variation in service quality. Conclusions. Local governments interested in developing meaningful performance measures of service outcomes should incorporate properly designed citizen satisfaction surveys implemented at the service‐district level. In addition, performance indicators of service inputs and outputs should be disaggregated to the service‐district level and matched to citizen satisfaction results in order to allocate and tailor resource policy decisions in a more informed manner.