Optimizing protein intake as a foraging strategy to maximize mass gain in an omnivore

Energy maximization, time minimization, and linear programming models subject to various constraints have dominated foraging ecology ideas and methods for decades. However, animals must use very complex physiological processes and foraging decisions to ensure fitness that in many cases may not be adequately described by these approaches. An example of this problem occurs when brown bears, Ursus arctos, have access to both abundant salmon and fruit. Salmon are one of the most energy and nutrient dense foods available to bears. Fruits are often high in soluble carbohydrates, low to deficient in many required nutrients, and more difficult to efficiently exploit. Therefore, wild brown bears that fatten primarily on fruits without access to salmon are 50% smaller than salmon‐feeding bears. Thus, we predicted based on a linear, energy‐maximizing model without dietary interaction effects that wild brown bears with access to both abundant salmon and fruit would feed almost exclusively on salmon. However, wild adult females with or without accompanying offspring foraged three times longer per day on fruit than on salmon. Similarly, the relative dry matter intake of ad libitum apples and salmon by captive, adult brown bears averaged 76±5% fruit and 24±5% salmon. Captive brown bears consuming mixed diets with intermediate dietary protein levels had 60% lower maintenance energy costs, 37% to 139% higher efficiencies of mass gain, and 72% to 520% higher maximum rates of gain than when they consumed either salmon or fruit alone. These relationships were nonlinear functions of dietary protein content in which salmon and fruit provided complementary nutritional resources. Both wild and captive bears attempted to regulate total protein, energy, and carbohydrate intake within a multidimensional intake target that both maximized energy intake and mass gain.