Premium
A field guide to models of sex‐ratio evolution in gynodioecious species
Author(s) -
Bailey Maia F.,
Delph Lynda F.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
oikos
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.672
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1600-0706
pISSN - 0030-1299
DOI - 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15315.x
Subject(s) - gynodioecy , biology , sex ratio , metapopulation , sex allocation , nuclear gene , population , ecology , evolutionary biology , demography , dioecy , genetics , gene , pollen , biological dispersal , sociology , genome
Gynodioecious plant species, species in which individuals are females or hermaphrodites, are ideal systems for studying connections between genetics, ecology, and long‐term evolutionary changes because sex determination can be complex, involving cytoplasmic and/or nuclear genes, and sex ratio is often variable across landscapes. Field data are needed to evaluate the many theories concerning this breeding system. In order to facilitate the gathering of relevant data, this paper introduces the four types of gynodiocy (nuclear, nuclear‐cytoplasmic and stochastic gynodioecy plus subdioecy), describes example species and expected patterns, discusses the various forces that drive the evolution of female frequencies, and gives concrete advice on where to start collecting data for different systems. For species in which females are relatively rare, we recommend reciprocal crosses to determine if sex‐determination is nuclear or nuclear‐cytoplasmic along with a search for correlations between female frequencies and ecological factors. For species in which females are common and sex ratios are highly variable, we recommend looking at female offspring sex ratios to determine if females are primarily produced in ephemeral epidemics. In the course of this discussion, we argue that the majority of natural gynodioecious species will have complex sex determination in which multiple cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) genes interact with multiple nuclear restorers of fertility. Sex‐ratio evolution in such species will be primarily influenced by fitness differences among hermaphrodites (costs of restoration) and less influenced by fitness differences between the sexes (compensation). Metapopulation dynamics alone may explain population sex ratios of species in which females are associated with marginal environments or hybrid zones; however, we feel that in most cases equilibrium forces within populations and metapopulation dynamics among populations each explain portions of the sex‐ratio pattern.