Premium
48
The effects of environmental factors on the resumption of photosynthetic activity of cyanobacterial mats following rehydration
Author(s) -
Fleming E. D.,
Norris T. B.,
Castenholz R. W.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of phycology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.85
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1529-8817
pISSN - 0022-3646
DOI - 10.1111/j.0022-3646.2003.03906001_48.x
Subject(s) - desiccation , photosynthesis , salinity , biology , intertidal zone , lyngbya , cyanobacteria , botany , light intensity , microbial mat , irradiance , photoinhibition , ecology , photosystem ii , genetics , physics , bacteria , optics , quantum mechanics
Extensive cyanobacterial mats cover the intertidal zone near Guerrero Negro, Baja California Sur. These mats are exposed to extreme desiccation and osmotic stress between tidal flows and rains, and spend most of the time dry and metabolically inactive. Therefore, periods of hydration are extremely important for growth as well as for repair of cellular damage from desiccation and ultraviolet radiation (UVR) accrued when the mat is dry. PAM fluorometry in conjunction with carbon incorporation assays were used to determine the effects of salinity, irradiance and UVR on the recovery of photosynthetic activity in these mats after an extended period of desiccation. The mat used in our study was primary composed of Lyngbya sp. Photosynthetic activity recovery rates (using PAM fluorometry) decreased with increasing salinity. This trend was similar under high and low light intensities, but rates were significantly lower under low light. Alternatively, the carbon incorporation method showed rates increased faster in salinities of 27 and 55 ppt than in salinities of 0 or 75 ppt. The Lyngbya mat also failed to recover photosynthetic potential in the dark. Although these mats recovered faster under high intensity light, the effect of salinity on photosynthesis is more complex. UVR did not affect the recovery of photosynthetic activity, no matter which method was used. This lack of effect is most likely due to the high content of the UVR screening pigment, scytonemin, in the upper layer of the mat.