z-logo
Premium
DISTRIBUTION OF TWO TYPES OF EMILIANIA HUXLEYI (PRYMNESIOPHYCEAE) IN THE NORTHEAST ATLANTIC REGION AS DETERMINED BY IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE AND COCCOLITH MORPHOLOGY 1
Author(s) -
Bleijswijk Judith,
Wal Paul,
Kempers Rob,
Veldhuis Marcel,
Young Jeremy R.,
Muyzer Gerard,
Vrindde Jong Elisabeth,
Westbroek Peter
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of phycology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.85
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1529-8817
pISSN - 0022-3646
DOI - 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1991.00566.x
Subject(s) - coccolith , emiliania huxleyi , biology , coccolithophore , morphology (biology) , paleontology , ecology , phytoplankton , carbonate , materials science , nutrient , metallurgy
Culture strains of Emiliania huxleyi (Lohmann 1902) Hay et al. 1967 were placed into two groups designated E. huxleyi type A and type B on the basis of coccolith morphology and immunological properties of the coccolith polysaccharide. We studied the distribution of these types in the North Atlantic region using an indirect immunofluorescence assay with antisera directed against the coccolith polysaccharide of E. huxleyi type A and type B and epifluorescence microscopy. In field samples taken in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean, E. huxleyi type A was found exclusively. In contrast, type B was dominant in the North Sea. Scanning electron microscopy of the samples revealed the same unequal distribution of the two types as found with the immunofluorescent‐labelling assay.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here