Premium
Sensitivity Analysis for Nonrandom Dropout: A Local Influence Approach
Author(s) -
Verbeke Geert,
Molenberghs Geert,
Thijs Herbert,
Lesaffre Emmanuel,
Kenward Michael G.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
biometrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.298
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1541-0420
pISSN - 0006-341X
DOI - 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00007.x
Subject(s) - dropout (neural networks) , sensitivity (control systems) , econometrics , missing data , statistics , longitudinal data , computer science , psychology , mathematics , machine learning , data mining , engineering , electronic engineering
Summary. Diggle and Kenward (1994, Applied Statistics 43 , 49–93) proposed a selection model for continuous longitudinal data subject to nonrandom dropout. It has provoked a large debate about the role for such models. The original enthusiasm was followed by skepticism about the strong but untestable assumptions on which this type of model invariably rests. Since then, the view has emerged that these models should ideally be made part of a sensitivity analysis. This paper presents a formal and flexible approach to such a sensitivity assessment based on local influence (Cook, 1986, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 48 , 133–169). The influence of perturbing a missing‐at‐random dropout model in the direction of nonrandom dropout is explored. The method is applied to data from a randomized experiment on the inhibition of testosterone production in rats.