z-logo
Premium
Caesarean delivery and outcome in very low birthweight infants
Author(s) -
Paul David A,
Sciscione Anthony,
Leef Kathleen H,
Stefano John L
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.734
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1479-828X
pISSN - 0004-8666
DOI - 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00047.x
Subject(s) - medicine , caesarean delivery , caesarean section , vaginal delivery , obstetrics , odds ratio , gestational age , confounding , intraventricular hemorrhage , neonatal intensive care unit , pediatrics , population , low birth weight , birth weight , pregnancy , genetics , environmental health , biology
Objective To determine the relationship between mode of delivery, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), and mortality in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. Study design A historical cohort study of infants admitted to a single level III neonatal intensive care unit during a five‐year period. Infants < 1500 g born by caesarean delivery (n = 400) were compared to those born by vaginal delivery (n = 305). Results After controlling for potential confounding variables including: gestational age, fetal presentation, and multiple birth, caesarean delivery was not associated with a decreased odds of IVH (odds ratio 1.2, 95% CI 0.7–2.0), severe IVH (1.9, 0.9–4.0), or mortality (1.2, 0.6–2.4). Conclusions In our population of very low birthweight infants, caesarean delivery is not associated with a decreased risk for mortality or intraventricular haemorrhage.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom