Premium
Optimal extended warranty strategy: uniform or nonuniform pricing?
Author(s) -
Zheng Bin,
Bian Yiwen,
Sun Yanhong,
Ding Husong
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international transactions in operational research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.032
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1475-3995
pISSN - 0969-6016
DOI - 10.1111/itor.12611
Subject(s) - warranty , profitability index , product (mathematics) , counterintuitive , point (geometry) , business , microeconomics , economics , actuarial science , finance , mathematics , philosophy , geometry , epistemology , political science , law
Manufacturers are increasingly selling extended warranties to achieve high profitability. An important question is to sell the traditional or flexible extended warranty (TEW vs. FEW). TEW is sold at the time of product sales with a uniform price, while FEW can be sold at the time of product sales (the first point) or at the end of base warranty (the second point) with nonuniform prices. When selling FEW, manufacturers need to decide whether to preannounce the difference between the first‐point and second‐point warranty prices. To address such challenging issues, we develop theoretical models regarding selling TEW or FEW and find that neither of the two warranty services is always superior to the other. Particularly, FEW outperforms TEW when the manufacturer's cost efficiency of warranty is relatively high and/or the total warranty duration is relatively short. Interestingly, when selling FEW, it is not always better off concealing the price difference information, which is counterintuitive.