z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Influenza A (H3) illness and viral aerosol shedding from symptomatic naturally infected and experimentally infected cases
Author(s) -
Bueno de Mesquita Paul Jacob,
NguyenVanTam Jonathan,
Killingley Ben,
Enstone Joanne,
LambkinWilliams Robert,
Gilbert Anthony S.,
Mann Alexander,
Forni John,
Yan Jing,
Pantelic Jovan,
Grantham Michael L.,
Milton Donald K.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
influenza and other respiratory viruses
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.743
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1750-2659
pISSN - 1750-2640
DOI - 10.1111/irv.12790
Subject(s) - viral shedding , asymptomatic , aerosol , medicine , immunology , influenza a virus , virology , virus , chemistry , organic chemistry
Abstract Background It has long been known that nasal inoculation with influenza A virus produces asymptomatic to febrile infections. Uncertainty persists about whether these infections are sufficiently similar to natural infections for studying human‐to‐human transmission. Methods We compared influenza A viral aerosol shedding from volunteers nasally inoculated with A/Wisconsin/2005 (H3N2) and college community adults naturally infected with influenza A/H3N2 (2012‐2013), selected for influenza‐like illness with objectively measured fever or a positive Quidel QuickVue A&B test. Propensity scores were used to control for differences in symptom presentation observed between experimentally and naturally infected groups. Results Eleven (28%) experimental and 71 (86%) natural cases shed into fine particle aerosols ( P  < .001). The geometric mean (geometric standard deviation) for viral positive fine aerosol samples from experimental and natural cases was 5.1E + 3 (4.72) and 3.9E + 4 (15.12) RNA copies/half hour, respectively. The 95th percentile shedding rate was 2.4 log 10 greater for naturally infected cases (1.4E + 07 vs 7.4E + 04). Certain influenza‐like illness‐related symptoms were associated with viral aerosol shedding. The almost complete lack of symptom severity distributional overlap between groups did not support propensity score–adjusted shedding comparisons. Conclusions Due to selection bias, the natural and experimental infections had limited symptom severity distributional overlap precluding valid, propensity score–adjusted comparison. Relative to the symptomatic naturally infected cases, where high aerosol shedders were found, experimental cases did not produce high aerosol shedders. Studying the frequency of aerosol shedding at the highest observed levels in natural infections without selection on symptoms or fever would support helpful comparisons.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here