Open AccessReal‐time surveillance systems: Applicability for the control of influenza in acute care
Author(s) -
QuirósGonzález Víctor,
RodríguezPérez Paz,
HaroPérez Ana Mª,
JiménezRodríguez Mª Mar,
MaderueloFernández José Ángel,
Eiros José Mª
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
influenza and other respiratory viruses
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.743
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1750-2659
pISSN - 1750-2640
DOI - 10.1111/irv.12720
Subject(s) - medicine , isolation (microbiology) , flu season , transmission (telecommunications) , vaccination , intervention (counseling) , emergency medicine , infection control , epidemiological surveillance , intensive care medicine , epidemiology , medical emergency , pediatrics , immunology , electrical engineering , psychiatry , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , engineering
Abstract Background The high morbidity and mortality caused by influenza viruses translate into a great impact on specialized health care. Apart from the annual vaccination, the relevance of other measures to prevent and control this infection is unknown. The objective of our research was to determine the importance of a real‐time surveillance system to establish early extended transmission precautions. Methods Quasi‐experimental before‐and‐after study comparing the influenza cases detected in hospitalized adults during the 2016/2017 season (264 patients) with those detected after the implementation of a real‐time surveillance system in the 2017/2018 season (519 patients). The improvements included early microbiological diagnosis, immediate communication of results, constant updating of patient information, coordination among professionals, periodic surveillance of the adequacy of preventive measures, and greater control of roommates. The effectiveness of the intervention was determined from the nosocomial infection rate in each season. Results After the real‐time surveillance system for influenza was implemented, patients with early microbiological diagnosis and immediate isolation increased significantly (13.7% vs 68.2%; P < .001). In addition, nosocomial infections decreased from 17% to 9.2% ( P = .001) and overall hospital stay was significantly reduced. Assuming that the entire effect was due to the intervention, the absolute risk reduction was 7.8% and number needed to treat was 12.8. Conclusion The results in our study reveal the impact of nosocomial transmission of influenza virus in a tertiary hospital and highlight the need to supplement traditional strategies with novel methodologies such as modern surveillance systems based on early diagnosis, close case monitoring, and coordination among professionals.