z-logo
Premium
Collective bargaining towards mutual flexibility and security goals in large internationalised companies—why do institutions (still) matter?
Author(s) -
Paolucci Valentina,
Marginson Paul
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
industrial relations journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.525
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 1468-2338
pISSN - 0019-8692
DOI - 10.1111/irj.12301
Subject(s) - negotiation , flexibility (engineering) , collective bargaining , business , democracy , industrial organization , economic system , economics , market economy , political science , management , law , politics
This paper examines the potential of collective bargaining to generate mutually advantageous flexibility and security outcomes at firm level. By focusing attention on actors' negotiating capacity at sites in Denmark and Italy of four large chemical‐pharmaceutical companies, it provides a nuanced, comparative explanation. The findings demonstrate that, across countries, differences in actors' capacity and negotiated outcomes are attributable to the stability and depth of collective bargaining institutions. Within country differences are accounted for by the organisational resources (internal democracy, external links and pro‐activity) of local trade unions, which condition their capacity to induce management to negotiate outcomes which benefit both parties.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here