Premium
Explaining cross‐national variations in the prevalence of envelope wages: some lessons from a 2013 E urobarometer survey
Author(s) -
Williams Colin C.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
industrial relations journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.525
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 1468-2338
pISSN - 0019-8692
DOI - 10.1111/irj.12077
Subject(s) - welfare state , redistribution (election) , modernization theory , wage , economics , welfare , politics , state (computer science) , labour economics , work (physics) , demographic economics , political science , public economics , economic growth , market economy , algorithm , computer science , law , mechanical engineering , engineering
The aim of this article is to evaluate competing theories that variously explain the greater prevalence of envelope wages in some countries either as: a legacy of under‐development (modernisation thesis); due to high taxes, state corruption and burdensome regulations and controls (neo‐liberal thesis), or a result of inadequate state intervention in work and welfare arrangements, which leaves workers less than fully protected (political economy thesis). Reporting a 2013 survey of cross‐national variations in the prevalence of envelope wages, the finding is that the results refute the neo‐liberal thesis but support both the modernisation and political economy theses, revealing that this illegitimate wage practice is more common in poorer, less equal countries with lower taxation and social protection levels and less effective redistribution via social transfers. The theoretical and policy implications are then discussed.