Premium
Don't Forget the Gravy! Are Bonuses Just Added on Top of Salaries?
Author(s) -
Green Colin P.,
Heywood John S.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
industrial relations: a journal of economy and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.61
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1468-232X
pISSN - 0019-8676
DOI - 10.1111/irel.12147
Subject(s) - salary , earnings , economics , pound (networking) , payment , panel data , argument (complex analysis) , compensation (psychology) , distribution (mathematics) , labour economics , econometrics , accounting , finance , market economy , mathematics , psychology , mathematical analysis , biochemistry , chemistry , psychoanalysis , world wide web , computer science
The press often depicts bonuses as extra payments to the already well compensated and calls for reform. Yet, these calls typically ignore the efficiency argument that bonuses are potentially risky performance pay that substitute for salary compensation. This paper uses representative UK data to estimate that bonuses appear not to substitute for salary in cross‐sectional estimates. Yet, when controlling for time‐invariant characteristics in panel data, bonuses emerge as partial substitutes. Each pound of bonus comes at a cost of 40 pence in other earnings. The degree of substitution is far larger at the bottom of the earnings distribution and far smaller at the top of the earnings distribution where, indeed, bonuses look more like gravy.