z-logo
Premium
Protective stabilization in pediatric dentistry: A qualitative study on the perceptions of mothers, psychologists, and pediatric dentists
Author(s) -
Ilha Mariana Cezar,
Feldens Carlos Alberto,
Razera Josiane,
Vivian Aline Groff,
Coelho Elisa Maria,
Kramer Paulo Floriani
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of paediatric dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.183
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1365-263X
pISSN - 0960-7439
DOI - 10.1111/ipd.12751
Subject(s) - feeling , medicine , qualitative research , distress , perception , family medicine , sedation , emotional distress , clinical psychology , anxiety , psychiatry , psychology , social psychology , anesthesia , social science , neuroscience , sociology
Background Evidence regarding the feelings evoked, distress caused, and the best way to conduct protective stabilization for the management of young children is lacking. Aim Describe the perceptions of mothers, psychologists, and pediatric dentists regarding the use of protective stabilization during the dental care of children up to three years of age attending a University Dental Clinic in southern Brazil. Design After watching a video of dental care involving the protective stabilization technique, individualized qualitative interviews were held with three groups [mothers (n = 5), psychologists (n = 7), and pediatric dentists (n = 4)] to investigate four categories of interest: importance of the technique, affective attitude, distress caused to the child, and participation of parents. After the transcription of the recorded comments, qualitative content analysis was performed. Results Protective stabilization generated emotional discomfort but was well accepted by all groups. All expressed the need to create a bond between the dentist and caregiver; and the active participation of the caregiver was considered fundamental. The mothers and psychologists rejected other options, such as passive restraint, general anesthesia, and sedation. Conclusion The three groups admitted having negative feelings, recognized the importance of protective stabilization, and suggested conditions for its use.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here