Premium
Enamel opacities in all other than Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation index teeth of adolescents
Author(s) -
Kevrekidou Aikaterini,
Kosma Ismini,
Kotsanos Ioannis,
Arapostathis Konstantinos Nikolaos,
Kotsanos Nikolaos
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of paediatric dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.183
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1365-263X
pISSN - 0960-7439
DOI - 10.1111/ipd.12735
Subject(s) - medicine , premolar , dentistry , molar , incisor , paediatric dentistry , orthodontics
Background There are scarce data on the hypomineralisation of other permanent teeth (HOPT) than the index teeth of Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH). Aim To report on the prevalence and surface pattern of HOPT and seek associations with MIH. Design Representative samples of urban Greek 14‐year‐olds were examined in classroom with a dental mirror. Their enamel defects were recorded using EAPD criteria for MIH. Descriptive statistics and correlation tests for HOPT vs previously reported MIH findings in the same samples were applied. Results HOPT prevalence in 1156 consented adolescents was 22.9%. 148 (16.2%) of 912 no‐MIH children had HOPT; 117 (48.1%) of the 244 MIH children had HOPT too (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.4‐3.6). There were more HOPT teeth per child in the MIH vs no‐MIH children ( P < .001). HOPT tooth frequency was as follows: second molar 33.7%, canine 25.7%, first premolar 23.6%, and second premolar 17.0%. Enamel breakdown was seen in 5.3% HOPT children. Vestibular to intraoral surface defect ratio differed between jaws (maxilla 187/88, mandible 149/17, P < .05). Conclusions Hypomineralisation defects in the MIH non‐index teeth collectively had comparable prevalence and tooth surface patterns to MIH, but much lower severity. MIH was predictor for HOPT.