Premium
The dental health of children subject to a child protection plan
Author(s) -
Keene Emily J.,
Skelton Ruth,
Day Peter F.,
Munyombwe Theresa,
Balmer Richard C.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of paediatric dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.183
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1365-263X
pISSN - 0960-7439
DOI - 10.1111/ipd.12149
Subject(s) - medicine , dentition , incidence (geometry) , pediatrics , mann–whitney u test , dentistry , permanent teeth , permanent dentition , oral health , test (biology) , family medicine , paleontology , physics , optics , biology
Background In the United Kingdom, child maltreatment is an area of increased awareness and concern. Aim To compare the dental health of children subject to child protection plans with controls. Design Children had to be aged between two and 11 years, medically healthy, and subject either to a child protection plan or attending the paediatric outpatient orthopaedic or general surgery clinics (control group). All children had a standardized oral examination. Results Seventy‐nine children were examined in each group. Children with child protection plans had statistically higher levels of primary tooth decay than controls (mean dmft 3.82 and 2.03, Mann–Whitney U test P = 0.002). After adjusting for socioeconomic status, the incidence rate ratios for the occurrence of dental caries in the primary dentition in children with a child protection plan was 1.76 (95% CI : 1.44–2.15) relative to the controls. There was no statistical difference in the levels of permanent tooth decay between the study and control groups (mean DMFT 0.71 and 0.30, respectively). The care index was significantly lower ( P = 0.008, Mann–Whitney U test) in the study group (1.69%) compared to the control group (6.02%). Conclusions Children subject to child protection plans had significantly higher levels of dental caries in the primary dentition.