A comparison of the education and work experiences of immigrant and the U nited S tates of A merica‐trained nurses

Aim This study examined the education and work experience of immigrant and A merican‐trained registered nurses from 1988 to 2008. Background The USA increasingly relies on immigrant nurses to fill a significant nursing shortage. These nurses receive their training overseas, but can obtain licenses to practice in different countries. Introduction Although immigrant nurses have been in the USA workforce for several decades, little is known about how their education and work experience compares with USA ‐trained nurses. Yet much is presumed by policy makers and administrators who perpetuate the stereotype that immigrant nurses are not as qualified. Methods We analysed the N ational S ample S urvey of R egistered N urses datasets from 1988 to 2008 using the C ochran– A rmitage trend tests. Results Our findings showed similar work experience and upward trends in education among both groups of nurses. However, A merican‐trained nurses were more likely to further advance their education, whereas immigrant nurses were more likely to have more work experience and practice in a wider range of healthcare settings. Discussion Although we discovered differences between nurses trained in the USA and abroad, we theorize that these differences even out, as education and work experience each have their own distinct caregiving advantages. Conclusion Immigrant nurses are not less qualified than their A merican‐trained counterparts. However, healthcare providers should encourage them to further pursue their education and certifications. Implications for nursing and health policy Even though immigrant nurses' education and work experience are comparable with their A merican counterparts, workforce development policies may be particularly beneficial for this group.