Premium
Defining nurse regulation and regulatory body performance: a policy D elphi study
Author(s) -
Benton D.C.,
GonzálezJurado M.A.,
BeneitMontesinos J.V.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international nursing review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.84
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1466-7657
pISSN - 0020-8132
DOI - 10.1111/inr.12027
Subject(s) - thematic analysis , privilege (computing) , delphi method , underpinning , public relations , set (abstract data type) , preference , political science , qualitative research , sociology , economics , computer science , law , social science , civil engineering , artificial intelligence , programming language , engineering , microeconomics
Context Professional self‐regulation is a privilege and needs to deliver against the underpinning social contract between the professional and citizens who are receiving care and services. Aims The aims of this study were to generate, international consensus on a contemporary definition of professional nurse regulation; and to articulate the key features of a highly performing regulatory body, and postulate which regulatory model and administrative arrangements are best suited to attain the key features. Method A highly diverse and globally recruited random stratified sample of 75 experts was approached to participate in a classic three‐round policy D elphi study. Quantitative and qualitative data were generated and subjected to thematic and statistical analysis. Both non‐parametric and descriptive statistical techniques were used in relation to quantitative data. Results Consensus on a revision of the current I nternational C ouncil of N urses definition of professional nurse regulation was developed and a set of 47 key features of high‐performing regulatory bodies was agreed. Although a strong preference for the delegated self‐regulatory model (43%) and single‐board administrative approach (48%) was expressed the underlying rationale for such a preference was unclear. Conclusion The research makes an important contribution to an underdeveloped field of study. The case for conducting more quantitative investigations to ascertain the best regulatory model and associated administrative approach has been made.