Premium
Nurses' preferred end‐of‐life treatment choices in five countries
Author(s) -
Coffey A.,
McCarthy G.,
Weathers E.,
Friedman M.I.,
Gallo K.,
Ehrenfeld M.,
Itzhaki M.,
Chan S.,
Li W.H.C.,
Poletti P.,
Zanotti R.,
Molloy D.W.,
McGlade C.,
Fitzpatrick J.J.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international nursing review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.84
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1466-7657
pISSN - 0020-8132
DOI - 10.1111/inr.12024
Subject(s) - nursing , duty , sample (material) , variety (cybernetics) , medicine , descriptive research , health care , family medicine , psychology , political science , chemistry , statistics , mathematics , chromatography , artificial intelligence , computer science , law
Background Previous research has focused on physician's perspectives of end‐of‐life ( EOL ) decision making as well as patient and family EOL decision making. There is a lack of research pertaining to the EOL treatment preferences of nurses and especially nurses working in a variety of care settings. Aim The aim of this study was to compare nurses' EOL treatment preferences in H ong K ong, I reland, I srael, I taly and the USA . Methods A comparative descriptive design was used with a convenience sample of nurses (n = 1089). A survey questionnaire using EOL hypothetical clinical case scenarios was used to collect data between J une 2011 and J uly 2012. Results Nurses in every country consistently chose a more aggressive option for patients than for themselves or for a parent. The treatment preferences of nurses varied from country to country. Lack of knowledge of patients' wishes and duty of care were the main influencing factors on treatment preferences. Study Limitations The study was limited to the hypothetical nature of the scenarios; however, the study highlights numerous future research questions. Conclusions This study is the first to examine and compare nurses' preferred EOL treatment choices in five countries from three different continents. The findings of this study raise several important questions for healthcare researchers, for policy development, and highlight the need for further international collaboration.