Premium
Indoor boundary layer chemistry modeling
Author(s) -
Morrison Glenn,
Lakey Pascale S. J.,
Abbatt Jonathan,
Shiraiwa Manabu
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
indoor air
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.387
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 1600-0668
pISSN - 0905-6947
DOI - 10.1111/ina.12601
Subject(s) - boundary layer , chemistry , environmental science , environmental chemistry , aerospace engineering , engineering
Ozone (O 3 ) chemistry is thought to dominate the oxidation of indoor surfaces. We consider the hypothesis that reactions taking place within indoor boundary layers result in greater than anticipated hydroxyl radical (OH) deposition rates. We develop models that account for boundary layer mass‐transfer phenomena, O 3 ‐terpene chemistry and OH formation, removal, and deposition; we solve these analytically and by applying numerical methods. For an O 3 ‐limonene system, we find that OH flux to a surface with an O 3 reaction probability of 10 −8 is 4.3 × 10 −5 molec/(cm 2 s) which is about 10 times greater than predicted by a traditional boundary layer theory. At very low air exchange rates the OH surface flux can be as much as 10% of that for O 3 . This effect becomes less pronounced for more O 3 ‐reactive surfaces. Turbulence intensity does not strongly influence the OH concentration gradient except for surfaces with an O 3 reaction probability >10 −4 . Although the O 3 flux dominates OH flux under most conditions, OH flux can be responsible for as much as 10% of total oxidant uptake to otherwise low‐reactivity surfaces. Further, OH chemistry differs from that for ozone; therefore, its deposition is important in understanding the chemical evolution of some indoor surfaces and surface films.