Premium
The effect of low ventilation rate with elevated bioeffluent concentration on work performance, perceived indoor air quality, and health symptoms
Author(s) -
Maula H.,
Hongisto V.,
Naatula V.,
Haapakangas A.,
Koskela H.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
indoor air
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.387
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 1600-0668
pISSN - 0905-6947
DOI - 10.1111/ina.12387
Subject(s) - indoor air quality , ventilation (architecture) , workload , work intensity , sick building syndrome , air quality index , work (physics) , odor , environmental science , intensity (physics) , open plan , audiology , medicine , psychology , environmental engineering , computer science , engineering , meteorology , mechanical engineering , physics , quantum mechanics , neuroscience , operating system , civil engineering
The aim of this laboratory experiment was to study the effects of ventilation rate, and related changes in air quality, predominantly bioeffluents, on work performance, perceived indoor air quality, and health symptoms in a typical conditions of modern open‐plan office with low material and equipment emissions. In Condition A, outdoor air flow rate of 28.2 l/s person ( CO 2 level 540 ppm) was applied and in Condition B, outdoor air flow rate was 2.3 l/s person ( CO 2 level 2260 ppm). CO 2 concentration level was used as an indicator of bioeffluents. Performance was measured with seven different tasks which measure different cognitive processes. Thirty‐six subjects participated in the experiment. The exposure time was 4 hours. Condition B had a weak negative effect on performance only in the information retrieval tasks. Condition B increased slightly subjective workload and perceived fatigue. No effects on health symptoms were found. The intensity of symptoms was low in both conditions. The experimental condition had an effect on perceived air quality and observed odor intensity only in the beginning of the session. Although the room temperature was controlled in both conditions, the heat was perceived to impair the performance more in Condition B.