Premium
Impact of asthma, exposure period, and filters on human responses during exposures to ozone and its initiated chemistry products
Author(s) -
Fadeyi M. O.,
Tham K. W.,
Wu W. Y.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
indoor air
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.387
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 1600-0668
pISSN - 0905-6947
DOI - 10.1111/ina.12161
Subject(s) - odor , asthma , ozone , chemistry , ventilation (architecture) , irritation , medicine , anesthesia , audiology , meteorology , immunology , physics , organic chemistry
The impact of asthma, exposure period, and filter condition downstream of the mixing box of air‐conditioning system on building occupants' perceptual response, work performance, and salivary α ‐amylase secretion during exposures to ozone and its initiated chemistry products is studied. The experiments were conducted in a field environmental chamber ( FEC ) (240 m 3 ) simulating an office environment. Experiments were conducted during periods when the air‐handling system operated with new or used pleated panel filters at constant recirculation (7/h) and ventilation (1/h) rates. Average ozone and secondary organic aerosols (ozone‐initiated chemistry products) measured during non‐asthmatic and asthmatic subjects' 3‐h exposures in the FEC were in the ranges approximately 20–37 ppb and approximately 1.6–3 μ g/m 3 , respectively. Asthmatic subjects' perceived odor intensity and sensory (eye, nose, and throat) irritation ratings were generally lower than those of non‐asthmatic subjects, possibly explaining why asthmatic subjects accept perceived air quality more than non‐asthmatic subjects. However, asthmatic subjects' perceived physiological‐like symptom ratings (flu, chest tightness, and headache) and concentrations of secreted salivary α ‐amylase were generally higher than those of non‐asthmatic subjects. Asthmatic subjects had significantly lower accuracy than non‐asthmatic subjects in a task that required higher concentration although they had higher work speed. Filter condition did not make any significant difference for subjects' responses.