z-logo
Premium
Co‐evolution with chicken class I genes
Author(s) -
Kaufman Jim
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
immunological reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.839
H-Index - 223
eISSN - 1600-065X
pISSN - 0105-2896
DOI - 10.1111/imr.12321
Subject(s) - biology , gene , class (philosophy) , genetics , computational biology , evolutionary biology , computer science , artificial intelligence
Summary The concept of co‐evolution (or co‐adaptation) has a long history, but application at molecular levels (e.g., ‘supergenes’ in genetics) is more recent, with a consensus definition still developing. One interesting example is the chicken major histocompatibility complex ( MHC ). In contrast to typical mammals that have many class I and class I‐like genes, only two classical class I genes, two CD 1 genes and some non‐classical Rfp‐Y genes are known in chicken, and all are found on the microchromosome that bears the MHC . Rarity of recombination between the closely linked and polymorphic genes encoding classical class I and TAP s allows co‐evolution, leading to a single dominantly expressed class I molecule in each MHC haplotype, with strong functional consequences in terms of resistance to infectious pathogens. Chicken tapasin is highly polymorphic, but co‐evolution with TAP and class I genes remains unclear. T‐cell receptors, natural killer ( NK ) cell receptors, and CD 8 co‐receptor genes are found on non‐ MHC chromosomes, with some evidence for co‐evolution of surface residues and number of genes along the avian and mammalian lineages. Over even longer periods, co‐evolution has been invoked to explain how the adaptive immune system of jawed vertebrates arose from closely linked receptor, ligand, and antigen‐processing genes in the primordial MHC .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here