z-logo
Premium
Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying NOD 2 risk‐associated polymorphisms in C rohn's disease
Author(s) -
Strober Warren,
Asano Naoki,
Fuss Ivan,
Kitani Atsushi,
Watanabe Tomohiro
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
immunological reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.839
H-Index - 223
eISSN - 1600-065X
pISSN - 0105-2896
DOI - 10.1111/imr.12193
Subject(s) - nod , biology , immunology , immune system , inflammation , nod mice , disease , population , innate immune system , autoimmunity , genetics , gene , medicine , pathology , environmental health
Summary The discovery that polymorphisms in the NOD 2 (nucleotide‐binding oligomerization domain containing 2) gene are associated with a greatly increased risk for the development of C rohn's disease has provided a means to achieve a deeper understanding of the dysregulation of mucosal immune responses to the commensal intestinal organisms that is thought to underlie this disease. NOD 2 is a NOD ‐like receptor ( NLR ) family member that senses and responds to bacterial wall peptides; thus, the most widely held view of the relation of the NOD 2 polymorphisms with C rohn's disease is that these polymorphisms lead to deficient immune responses to gut bacteria, and these, in turn, lead to quantitative or qualitative changes in the bacterial population in the gut lumen or lamina propria that cause inflammation at this site. Initially, this view was based mainly on the observation that defective NOD 2 function can result in reduced α‐defensin production by intestinal Paneth cells and that such impairment leads to loss of host defense against gut bacteria. In this review, we reconsider this possibility and marshal evidence that it is not in fact likely to be a prime element of C rohn's disease causation. More recently, evidence has been accumulating that the NOD 2 dysfunction leads to C rohn's inflammation by inducing changes in the gut microbiome that influence immune effector or regulatory function. We review the strengths and weaknesses of this emerging hypothesis. Finally, we consider the possibility that NOD 2 dysfunction can lead to inflammation because of a second and somewhat overlooked aspect of its function, that as an immunoregulator of innate immune responses. In particular, we review the body of evidence that NOD 2 stimulation activates a cross‐tolerance response that downregulates and thus prevents excessive TLR responses that cause C rohn's inflammation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here