Premium
Author reply
Author(s) -
Alnasrallah Basil,
Alawami Mohammed
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
internal medicine journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.596
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-5994
pISSN - 1444-0903
DOI - 10.1111/imj.14731
Subject(s) - medicine , citation , library science , family medicine , computer science
for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2014;66:303–318. 4. Paraiso M, Jelovsek J, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1005–1013. 5. Kenton K, Mueller ER, Tarney C, et al. One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22:382–384. 6. Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:5–12. 7. Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26. 8. Adapted from Dolgin MAssociation NYHFox AC, Gorlin R, Levin RI, New York Heart Association. Criteria Committee. Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1994. March 1. 9. Ambrosino N, Simonds A. The clinical management in extremely severe COPD. Respir Med. 2007;101:1613–1624. 10. Simren M, Palsson OS, Whitehead WE. Update on Rome IV criteria for colorectal disorders: implications for clinical practice. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19:15. 11. Filocamo MT, Serati M, Li Marzi V, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): linguistic validation of the Italian version. J Sex Med. 2014;11:447–453. 12. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Continence program for women research group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14:131–139. 13. Artibani W, Pesce F, Prezioso D, et al. FLOW Study Group. Italian validation of the urogenital distress inventory and its application in LUTS patients. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1323–1329. 14. McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18:1007– 1019. 15. Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo. Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21:523–528. 16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213. 17. Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:3–15. 18. Chan SS, Pang SM, Cheung TH, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17:54–60. 19. Seror J, Yates DR, Seringe E, et al. Prospective comparison of shortterm functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robotassisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.World J Urol. 2012;30:393–398.