Premium
Survival and predictors of outcome among patients with decompensated liver disease in a non‐liver transplant intensive care unit. Pessimism is historical and unjustified
Author(s) -
Sadick Victoria,
Bowcock Emma,
Lane Stuart,
Seppelt Ian
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
internal medicine journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.596
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-5994
pISSN - 1444-0903
DOI - 10.1111/imj.14151
Subject(s) - medicine , intensive care unit , hepatic encephalopathy , liver disease , liver transplantation , model for end stage liver disease , intensive care medicine , cirrhosis , retrospective cohort study , mortality rate , observational study , etiology , intensive care , emergency medicine , transplantation
Background Recent literature emanating from the United Kingdom and United States has reported decreasing mortality rates in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and organ failures presenting to the intensive care unit (ICU). Aim To determine if there were comparable outcomes in a single‐centre non‐transplant unit in Australia. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary, non‐liver transplant unit in Sydney, Australia. Admission data and mortality outcomes were collected from patients with cirrhosis non‐electively admitted to ICU between 2013 and 2017. Liver‐specific and general intensive care scoring tools were also assessed for their discriminative ability to predict short‐term prognostic outcomes. Results Sixty‐three patients were admitted with decompensated liver disease who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall hospital mortality was 37% (95% CI: 0.26–0.49). There was no difference in survival based on aetiology of liver disease ( P = 0.96) but a significant difference was found based on the presenting diagnosis, with greater survival among patients diagnosed with hepatic encephalopathy on ICU admission ( P = 0.02). There was 4% mortality in patients with no organ failure and 52% mortality in those with ≥3 organs in failure ( P < 0.001). The ICU prognostic Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was the better discriminative tool in predicting short‐term outcomes when compared to liver prognostic scores. Conclusion The outcomes of this single‐centre Australian study align with current overseas literature. These results reinforce and expand on limited local evidence, corroborating the former universal prognostic pessimism towards cirrhotic patients with organ failure as unwarranted.