Premium
Exploring the interface between ‘physician‐assisted death’ and palliative care: cross‐sectional data from Australasian palliative care specialists
Author(s) -
Sheahan L.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
internal medicine journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.596
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-5994
pISSN - 1444-0903
DOI - 10.1111/imj.13009
Subject(s) - palliative care , medicine , context (archaeology) , assisted suicide , family medicine , end of life care , nursing , demographics , psychiatry , paleontology , biology , demography , sociology
Background Legalisation of physician‐assisted dying ( PAD ) remains a highly contested issue. In the Australasian context, the opinion and perspective of palliative care specialists have not been captured empirically, and are required to inform better the debate around this issue, moving forward. Aim To identify current attitudes and experiences of palliative care specialists in Australasia regarding requests for physician‐assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia, and to capture the opinion of palliative care specialists on the legalisation of these practices in the Australasian context. Method An anonymous, cross‐sectional, online survey of Australasian specialists in palliative care, addressing the following six areas: (i) demographics; (ii) frequency of requests, and response given; (iii) understanding of the term ‘voluntary euthanasia’; (iv) opinion regarding legalisation of physician‐assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia in Australasia, and willingness to participate if legal; (v) identification of the most important values guiding this opinion; and (vi) anticipated impact that legalisation of assisted death would have on palliative care practice. Results Important findings include: (i) palliative care specialists are largely opposed to the legalisation of PAD; (ii) the proportional titration of opioids is not understood by any palliative care specialist studied to be ‘voluntary euthanasia’; and (iii) there is a wide variation in frequency of requests, and one‐third of palliative care specialists express discomfort in dealing with requests for assisted suicide or euthanasia. Conclusion Key areas for future research at the interface between PAD and best practice end‐of‐life care are identified, including exploration into why palliative care specialists are largely opposed to PAD , and consideration of the impact ‘the opioid misconception’ may have on the literature informing this debate.