z-logo
Premium
Transition from hospital to primary care: an audit of discharge summary – medication changes and follow‐up expectations
Author(s) -
Tan B.,
Mulo B.,
Skinner M.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
internal medicine journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.596
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-5994
pISSN - 1444-0903
DOI - 10.1111/imj.12581
Subject(s) - medicine , documentation , audit , emergency medicine , hospital discharge , primary care , medline , patient discharge , acute care , medical emergency , intensive care medicine , family medicine , health care , management , computer science , political science , law , economics , programming language , economic growth
Background The clinical discharge summary remains a critical, but often poorly implemented tool in communication with primary care. An area of concern is the documentation of medication lists and appropriate follow up of medication changes. Aims To assesses the accuracy of documentation of medication changes and expectations with regard to follow up from an acute assessment unit ( AAU ) of a tertiary metropolitan hospital. Methods All patients who were admitted and discharged directly from the unit during the month of J une 2013 were audited. For all admissions, discharge summaries were audited for medication errors and for the appropriate documentation of indications and follow up for prescribed medications. All medications prescribed on discharge were collated using the W orld H ealth O rganization A natomical, T herapeutic and C hemical ( ATC ) classification. Results I n total, 219 admissions were analysed. There were 204 out of 219 (93.1%) discharge summaries that had an accurate medication list. Of 219 (74%) patients, 163 had at least one change to their medications during admission. Of 163 discharge summaries, 82 (50%) contained information regarding their indication and outpatient management. The most commonly prescribed classes along with the rates of indication and follow up documentation were anti‐infectives (62%), gastrointestinal (51%), cardiovascular (50%) and central nervous system (44%). Conclusion Although there were fewer documentation errors in discharge summaries than previously described in the literature, concerns regarding the documentation of medication indication and follow up remain.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here