Premium
Child Migration in the US and Spain: Towards a Global Border Regime?
Author(s) -
Vives Luna
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international migration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.681
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1468-2435
pISSN - 0020-7985
DOI - 10.1111/imig.12704
Subject(s) - militarization , deportation , argument (complex analysis) , externalization , immigration , political science , irregular migration , punitive damages , political economy , politics , border security , human rights , state (computer science) , refugee , immigration policy , development economics , sociology , law , ethnology , economics , psychology , biochemistry , chemistry , algorithm , computer science , psychoanalysis
In The New Politics of Immigration , Professor Catherine Dauvergne proposes that as migration policies converge at the global level, the traditional difference between settler societies and former European colonies is becoming irrelevant. To test this argument, this article addresses the impact of externalization, militarization, detention and deportation on unaccompanied migrant children along the southern Spanish and US borders. I conclude that the combined used of these strategies is designed to keep all unwanted migrants away from the physical border of the state, regardless of their background, and prevents children from accessing specific protections. Current border policy in these two countries shows the primacy of national security concerns over human rights and supports Dauvergne’s argument that distinctions between former colonies and settler societies are disappearing. The evidence considered here points towards an increasingly restrictive and punitive global border regime, but one with regional variations.