Premium
Ambulatory robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with extended recovery by total extraperitoneal approach
Author(s) -
Low Alvin WX,
Chen Kenneth,
Tan Yu Guang,
Ng Tze Kiat,
Yuen John Shyi P
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.172
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1442-2042
pISSN - 0919-8172
DOI - 10.1111/iju.14509
Subject(s) - medicine , ambulatory , laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , prostatectomy , surgery , prostate cancer , laparoscopy , urology , cancer
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of performing robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in an ambulatory with extended recovery setting by using a total extraperitoneal approach. Methods Patients with low‐ to intermediate‐risk, prostate cancer were prospectively recruited in the ambulatory robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with extended recovery by total extraperitoneal approach group ( n = 30), and a matched‐pair inpatient surgery control group by total extraperitoneal approach ( n = 20). Objective discharge criteria were based on the postanesthesia discharge scoring system. All patients underwent preoperative counseling on preoperative preparation and postoperative care. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the ambulatory with extended recovery‐total extraperitoneal approach and inpatient‐total extraperitoneal approach groups in patient factors (age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson Comorbidity Index), disease factors (prostate‐specific antigen, clinical T stage, biopsy Gleason score, prostate volume) and peri‐operative parameters (operative time, blood loss, Trendelenburg angle). All total extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy patients (ambulatory with extended recovery and inpatient surgery groups) met the postanesthesia discharge scoring system discharge criteria ≤23 h from admission. The mean hospital stays for ambulatory with extended recovery‐total extraperitoneal and inpatient‐total extraperitoneal groups were 20.3 and 52.4 h, respectively ( P < 0.001). A total of 29 of 30 patients (97%) in the ambulatory with extended recovery‐total extraperitoneal group were discharged ≤23 h of admission. Conclusions This is the first prospective evaluation of robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by the total extraperitoneal approach, showing that the short‐stay ambulatory with extended recovery approach is safe, feasible and with a high success rate. Total extraperitoneal surgical approach is a critical factor for the success of the ambulatory with extended recovery protocol.