z-logo
Premium
Treatment satisfaction and clinically meaningful symptom improvement in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and prostatic enlargement secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: Secondary results from a 6‐month, randomized, double‐blind study comparing finasteride plus tadalafil with finasteride plus placebo
Author(s) -
Roehrborn Claus G,
Casabé Adolfo,
Glina Sidney,
Sorsaburu Sebastian,
Henneges Carsten,
Viktrup Lars
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.172
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1442-2042
pISSN - 0919-8172
DOI - 10.1111/iju.12741
Subject(s) - medicine , finasteride , urology , lower urinary tract symptoms , confidence interval , international prostate symptom score , placebo , prostate , tadalafil , randomization , randomized controlled trial , hyperplasia , gynecology , erectile dysfunction , pathology , alternative medicine , cancer
Objectives To report the secondary analyses of treatment satisfaction and clinically meaningful improvements in a randomized study comparing coadministration of tadalafil 5 mg with finasteride 5 mg versus finasteride alone in men with prostatic enlargement secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods An international, randomized, double‐blind, parallel study was carried out in men aged ≥45 years who were 5‐alpha reductase inhibitor naïve, and had an International Prostate Symptom Score ≥13 and prostate volume ≥30 mL; 350 men received placebo/finasteride and 345 received tadalafil/finasteride over 26 weeks. Treatment satisfaction was assessed per protocol using the Treatment Satisfaction Scale‐Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Responder cut‐offs, analyzed post‐hoc were total International Prostate Symptom Score improvement ≥3 points or ≥25% from randomization. Results Baseline patient characteristics were generally comparable between responders and non‐responders. The proportion of patients with an International Prostate Symptom Score improvement ≥3 points with tadalafil/finasteride and placebo/finasteride, respectively, at week 4 was 57.0% and 47.9% (OR 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.97), at week 12 was 68.8% and 60.7% (OR 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.07–2.05) and at week 26 was 71.4% and 70.2% (OR 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.81–1.61); for IPSS change ≥25%, the corresponding proportions were 44.8% and 32.9% (OR 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.21–2.28), 55.5% and 51.9% (OR 1.18, 95% confidence interval 0.87–1.62), and 62.0% and 58.3% (OR 1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.89–1.70). Treatment satisfaction at week 26 was significantly greater with tadalafil/finasteride versus placebo/finasteride for total treatment satisfaction scale score ( P =0.031) and satisfaction with efficacy subscore ( P  = 0.025); scores were not significantly different between treatments for satisfaction with dosing or side‐effects (both P  ≥ 0.371). Conclusions Tadalafil/finasteride results in significantly more patients achieving early clinical meaningful improvements in symptoms, and in greater treatment satisfaction versus placebo/finasteride.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom