z-logo
Premium
Usefulness of automated fragmented red blood cell percentage in the diagnosis of paediatric haemolytic uraemic syndrome
Author(s) -
Govindarajan Srinivasavaradan,
Bhatia Prateek,
Dawman Lesa,
Tiewsoh Karalanglin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of laboratory hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.705
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1751-553X
pISSN - 1751-5521
DOI - 10.1111/ijlh.13324
Subject(s) - schistocyte , medicine , peripheral blood , haemolysis , pediatrics , thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura , gastroenterology , surgery , immunology , platelet
Presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood smear supporting haemolysis is important for diagnosis and decision‐making in paediatric haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS). High observer dependency and requirement of expertise for peripheral smear evaluation propels us to think of other modalities to overcome these issues. We envisage that newer techniques like automated fragmented red blood cell percentage (FRC %), whose role has been described in transplant associated HUS and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, can serve the purpose. Methods Twenty‐eight children with HUS after excluding secondary causes were enrolled in this study. Blood samples were analysed for FRC% at admission, using SYSMEX XN‐1000 (Japan) haematology analyser, and simultaneously, schistocytes in peripheral smear were reported by a single expert haematopathologist. Results Median age was 56 months ranging from 2 to 140 months. FRC% was elevated in 85.8% (n‐24/28) with a mean of 4.56 ± 3.1%. FRC% had a sensitivity of 95.4% (C.I: 77.16% to 99.88%) in children who had FRC% >1.49% with an accuracy of 85.71% (C.I: 67.33% to 95.97%). However, specificity was only 50% (C.I: 11.81% to 88.19%) with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.91. Receiver‐operator curve showed an AUC value of 0.841. Conclusion We suggest automated FRC% as a rapid and highly sensitive index for screening of paediatric HUS; however, a peripheral blood film examination is a must in cases with count >2% to avoid false positives as the index has low specificity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here