Premium
Comparison of the international normalized ratio levels obtained by portable coagulometer and laboratory in a clinic specializing in oral anticoagulation
Author(s) -
Meneghelo Z. M.,
Barroso C. M. Q.,
Liporace I. L.,
Cora A. P.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of laboratory hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.705
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1751-553X
pISSN - 1751-5521
DOI - 10.1111/ijlh.12333
Subject(s) - medicine , venipuncture , vitamin k , atrial fibrillation , prothrombin time , surgery
Summary Introduction Therapy with Vitamin K antagonists ( VKA ) is effective in reducing thromboembolic events in various diseases. There are limitations however, which limit clinical handling and maintaining INR within therapeutic range. Studies have shown that portable coagulometers, when compared to laboratory tests, are more practical and provide better patient adherence and involvement toward treatment which results in better INR control. This study aimed to evaluate laboratory obtained INR results compared to two different portable coagulometers. Methods A prospective study which monitored 1009 patients using VKA in the Anticoagulation Clinic at the Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology in São Paulo between July and September 2012. Patient INR values were obtained by the laboratory through venipuncture and then compared to INR values obtained by capillary puncture from two different portable coagulometers. Results Overall, 1009 patients were included in the study; among these, 520 (51.5%) are male with average age of 59.6 years (13–91). The more common indications were atrial fibrillation (49.9%) and mechanical prosthesis (33.7%). The correlation coefficient was of 0.95 with and 0.88 with INR atio PT Monitor ® compared to laboratory. In patients with INR < 2 (lower than therapeutic range), the coefficient was 0.92 and 0.81 for CoaguChek XS plus ® and INR atio PT Monitor ® respectively. In patients within therapeutic range ( INR 2–3), the coefficient was 0.86 with CoaguChek XS Plus ® and 0.76 with INR atio PT Monitor ® . For INR above therapeutic range ( INR > 3.0) the correlation was 0.80 with CoaguChek XS Plus ® and 0.54 with INR atio PT Monitor ® . As for concordance between methods, the intraclass correlation coefficients ( ICC ) were slightly smaller than those previously stated ( ICC = 0.899 with CoaguChek XS Plus ® and ICC = 0.716 with INR atio PT Monitor ® ). Conclusion The use of portable coagulometers was comparable to laboratory tests and better correlation coefficients were observed with CoaguChek XS Plus ® and in patients with INR lower or within therapeutic range. Portable coagulometers proved to be a useful and reliable tool for INR control in patients using VKA .