Premium
Comparing the views of the Italian general public and scientists on GMOs
Author(s) -
Pappalardo Gioacchino,
D’Amico Mario,
Lusk Jayson L.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of food science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.831
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1365-2621
pISSN - 0950-5423
DOI - 10.1111/ijfs.14993
Subject(s) - opposition (politics) , public opinion , agriculture , political science , sample (material) , scientific evidence , food safety , agricultural biotechnology , public relations , law , geography , politics , medicine , philosophy , chemistry , archaeology , epistemology , chromatography , pathology
Summary The gap between statements from scientific organisations about the safety of genetically modified (or GMO) food and public concerns about the technology is puzzling, raising questions about the extent to which expert opinion and scientific consensus can sway public opinion and whether scientific progress might be hindered by public opposition. This study sought to determine whether beliefs about GMO safety are high among experts in countries where there has been significant public opposition to the technology. Surveys conducted among 1006 members of the Italian general public and 258 members of the Italian Association of the Agricultural Science Societies (AISSA) reveal that whereas 54% of our sample of the Italian general public believes GMOs are generally safe to eat, 81% of sample of the Italian agricultural scientists believe the same. Despite the gap in lay‐expert safety beliefs, results reveal greater similarity between scientists and the general public on topics related to beliefs about the impact of GM food on food prices, the developing world and concentration in the agricultural supply chain.