z-logo
Premium
Comparing effects of α‐ vs. β‐chitosan coating and emulsion coatings on egg quality during room temperature storage
Author(s) -
Pujols Kairy Dharali,
Osorio Luis,
Carrillo Elsy Paola,
Wardy Wisdom,
Torrico Damir Dennis,
No Hong Kyoon,
Corredor José Andrés Herrera,
Prinyawiwatkul Witoon
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of food science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.831
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1365-2621
pISSN - 0950-5423
DOI - 10.1111/ijfs.12468
Subject(s) - emulsion , coating , chitosan , food science , shelf life , cold storage , chemistry , food preservation , materials science , biology , biochemistry , horticulture , organic chemistry
Summary Effects of α‐ and β‐chitosan ( CH ), soybean oil ( SO ) and their emulsions ( CH : SO  = 2:3) as coating materials on selected internal quality and sensory properties of eggs were evaluated during 5 weeks storage at 25 °C. After 3 weeks of storage, α‐ and β‐CH‐coated eggs changed to B grade, while SO ‐ and emulsion‐coated eggs preserved grade A quality. Weight loss of eggs coated with SO and CH : SO emulsions was <2.0% vs. 5.3–5.8% for noncoated and CH ‐coated eggs after 5 weeks of storage. β‐ CH (0.9%) maintained lower weight loss of eggs than α‐ CH (1.2%) only at 1‐week storage. Albumen pH of eggs coated with SO and CH : SO emulsions decreased progressively throughout storage. Eggs coated with β‐ CH : SO emulsion and SO were significantly glossier than noncoated eggs. Consumers indicated positive purchase intent (69.17–76.67%) for all coated eggs. Overall, α‐ CH : SO and β‐ CH : SO emulsions extended egg shelf life by at least 3 weeks during room temperature storage.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom