Premium
Differences between Stevens‐Johnson syndrome versus toxic epidermal necrolysis
Author(s) -
Nowsheen Somaira,
Lehman Julia S.,
elAzhary Rokea A.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-4632
pISSN - 0011-9059
DOI - 10.1111/ijd.15287
Subject(s) - toxic epidermal necrolysis , medicine , mucocutaneous zone , dermatology , retrospective cohort study , mortality rate , erythroderma , pediatrics , disease , surgery
Background To retrospectively review the outcomes of two rare cutaneous diseases, Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and to question the practice of averaging the mortality rate on the assumption that they are one disease. Methods A retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with SJS and TEN by a dermatologist between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2020, at our institution was performed. Seventy‐one patients were identified (21 pediatric and 50 adults). Pathology slides from 32 adult patients (64%) were evaluated by a blinded board‐certified dermatopathologist. Results Of the adult patients, 31 had SJS, two had SJS‐TEN overlap, and 17 had TEN. All 21 patients in the pediatric group were diagnosed with SJS mainly caused by Mycoplasma. Mortality rates were 6.5% for SJS among adults and 35.3% for TEN. Chemotherapy‐induced TEN is a trigger with 50% mortality. Conclusions SJS was more common in adults and pediatric cases than TEN (3:1) and had a much better prognosis and outcome. Combining and averaging the mortality rates of TEN and SJS are not advised as SJS is mainly a mucocutaneous disorder with good prognosis versus TEN, a systemic toxicity of multiple organs with deep skin detachment.