Premium
Screening for C hlamydia infection in a sexually transmitted infection clinic: a missed opportunity?
Author(s) -
Pedrosa Ana Filipa,
Azevedo Filomena,
Lisboa Carmen
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.677
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-4632
pISSN - 0011-9059
DOI - 10.1111/ijd.12338
Subject(s) - medicine , asymptomatic , sex organ , pediatrics , gynecology , biology , genetics
Objectives C hlamydia trachomatis ( CT ) infection is the most common sexually transmitted infection ( STI ) reported in E urope. We aim to evaluate the overall prevalence of CT infection and the rate of asymptomatic infection in an STI clinic over a 5‐year period. We will also discuss screening strategies with reference to attendees diagnosed with an STI and their sexual partners, and attendees with a non‐infectious genital dermatosis. Methods Clinical and laboratory data for all attendees at a university hospital STI clinic over a 5‐year period were reviewed. Diagnosis of CT infection was made upon polymerase chain reaction ( PCR ) performed in first‐void urine. Results The overall prevalence of CT infection was 4.0% (53/1310); the rate of asymptomatic infection was 84.9% (45/53). The prevalence of CT infection among attendees with an STI diagnosis and their sexual partners was 5.2% (50/963), whereas that among attendees with a non‐infectious genital dermatosis was 0.9% (3/347; P < 0.001). Infected attendees were younger than attendees without CT infection (median age: 31 years vs. 40 years; P < 0.001). In 39.5% (17/43) of CT ‐infected attendees, it was possible to notify a sexual partner; CT infection was subsequently diagnosed in 58.8% (10/17) of partners. Conclusions Asymptomatic CT infection had a representative frequency, which was more pronounced among young attendees with an STI diagnosis and their sexual partners, to whom screening should be offered. Issues of age limits for screening and whether screening should be directed to males in non‐ STI clinic settings should be carefully assessed.