z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reconstruction of Achilles region defects: A single‐centre experience
Author(s) -
Eser Cengiz,
Karagoz Ceylan Ozgun Ilke,
Gencel Eyuphan,
Tabakan Ibrahim,
Kokacya Omer,
Yavuz Metin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.756
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1742-1241
pISSN - 1368-5031
DOI - 10.1111/ijcp.14908
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , achilles tendon , skin grafting , perforator flaps , wound dehiscence , dehiscence , free flap , circumflex , artery , tendon
Background Reconstruction of Achilles tendon and the overlying tissue defects is a challenging undertaking. The spectrum of available repair methods range from secondary healing to the use of free flaps. The aim of this study was to discuss reconstruction options and to help the surgeon to select reliable approach to achieve favourable outcomes. Method In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 14 patients who underwent reconstruction of Achilles region defect between 2016 and 2019 at a single centre. Results Reconstructions were performed with secondary healing (n = 2), negative pressure wound therapy and skin grafting (n = 2), free flaps (n = 6) and local and distant flaps (n = 4). Satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcomes were achieved in all patients. One patient developed partial skin graft loss. Marginal necrosis occurred in one of the local flaps. Wound dehiscence and flap retraction occurred in one of the free (superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator) flaps. One patient undergoing reconstruction with ulnar artery perforator flap developed intraoperative atrial fibrillation; the operation was terminated and reconstruction completed with skin grafting. Conclusion Orthoplastic reconstruction should be kept in mind for Achilles tendon defects. The use of special digital imaging techniques facilitates flap surgery and helps minimise the risk of flap complications. Conventional approaches are suitable for shallow small skin lesions. Local flaps are good options for deeper skin defects owing to superior aesthetic outcomes. Super‐thin free flaps offer a distinct advantage in skillful hands. The use of multi‐content free chimeric flaps for reconstruction of complex defects facilitates better anatomical repair. Cross leg or flow‐through flaps may be considered in patients with compromised distal circulation. Selection of the most reliable approach for Achilles reconstruction is a key imperative to achieve favourable outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here