
Comparison of the effect of educational and self‐management interventions on adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Author(s) -
Yangöz Şefika Tuğba,
Özer Zeynep,
Boz İlkay
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.756
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1742-1241
pISSN - 1368-5031
DOI - 10.1111/ijcp.13842
Subject(s) - medicine , psychological intervention , hemodialysis , randomized controlled trial , meta analysis , checklist , self management , strictly standardized mean difference , physical therapy , intensive care medicine , psychiatry , psychology , machine learning , computer science , cognitive psychology
Background Adherence to fluid intake, diet, and drug management is very important in hemodialysis patients. Educational and self‐management interventions are frequently used to improve adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients. Objectives To synthesize a comparison of the effect of educational and self‐management interventions on adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients in randomized controlled trials. Methods Systematic searches were conducted using 11 multidisciplinary databases in June 2020. The PRISMA checklist was used. The subgroup analysis was used to compare the effect of educational and self‐management interventions on adherence to fluid intake, diet, and drug management. Results In the included studies, educational interventions were performed ranging from 15 to 60 minutes, in 1‐72 sessions. Self‐management interventions were performed ranging from 10 to 120 minutes, in 1‐84 sessions. The overall effect of educational interventions was small on adherence to fluid intake ( P = .019, Hedges’ g = −0.39), diet in serum phosphorus level ( P = .001, Hedges’ g = −0.35), drug management ( P = .002, Hedges’ g = −0.44), and not significant on adherence to diet in serum potassium level ( P = .181). The overall effect of self‐management interventions was small on adherence to fluid intake ( P = .001, Hedges’ g = −0.19) and diet in serum phosphorus level ( P < .001, Hedges’ g = −0.42). Additionally, the overall effect of self‐management interventions was moderate on adherence to diet in serum potassium level ( P = .002, Hedges’ g = −0.75) and drug management ( P < .001, Hedges’ g = −0.55). There was no difference between the educational and self‐management interventions on adherence to fluid intake, diet, and drug management ( P > .05). Conclusions The analysis shows that educational and self‐management interventions had a beneficial effect on adherence to fluid intake, diet, and drug management and no difference between these interventions. Therefore, these interventions can be used by healthcare professionals. It is also recommended that these interventions be well defined and transferable to routine clinical practice.