Open Access
Cataract surgery in Kinshasa—Is there a place for “Monovision”?
Author(s) -
Stahnke Thomas,
Mukwanseke Edith,
Kilangalanga Ngoy J.,
Hopkins Adrian,
Stachs Oliver,
Guthoff Rudolf F.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.756
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1742-1241
pISSN - 1368-5031
DOI - 10.1111/ijcp.13588
Subject(s) - presbyopia , medicine , near vision , optometry , accommodation , cataract surgery , visual acuity , ophthalmology , refractive surgery , ocular dominance , cornea , optics , visual cortex , physics , neuroscience , biology
Abstract Objectives Monovision is a method of correcting presbyopia where one eye is focused for far and the other for near vision. It is a simple, cost‐effective approach to overcome the loss of accommodation with age and to become spectacles independent. Methodology About 50 patients, where bilateral cataract extraction was indicated, were included in this study performed at the St. Joseph's Eye Hospital in Kinshasa (DR Congo). Small incision cataract surgery technique (SICS) was applied with the implantation of 6 mm PMMA lenses in the capsular bag. IOL refractive power choice was made to achieve a post‐operative refraction of −0.5 dpt for the eye selected for far vision. The second eye received an implant heading for a post‐operative myopia of −1.5 dpt suitable for intermediated and near vision. According to the literature, monovision criteria have been regarded as fulfilled when (a) far vision was 0.5 (logMAR) or better and (b) near vision was P3 (0.40, Decimal 32 cm) or better. Spectacle dependence after bilateral cataract surgery heading for monovision was analysed using a dedicated questionnaire. Results Out of all 50 patients 22 (44%) fulfilled the above defined criteria of monovision in terms of post‐operative refraction and visual acuity. About 19 out of these 22 (86.3%) patients were happy without glasses. Two of them used bifocal spectacles, whereas the remaining patient refused spectacles. About 28 patients did not fulfill monovision criteria. Out of these 28 patients, however, 9 (32.1%) of them are happy without glasses. Conclusion In view of the described local circumstances aiming for monovision after bilateral cataract surgery is a suitable approach to optimise cataract surgical outcomes with no extra costs for surgery but considerable improvement of patient's visual performance in daily life.