Open AccessAcanthosis nigricans in middle‐age adults: A highly prevalent and specific clinical sign of insulin resistance
Author(s) -
ÁlvarezVillalobos Neri Alejandro,
RodríguezGutiérrez René,
GonzálezSaldivar Gloria,
SánchezGarcía Adriana,
GómezFlores Minerva,
QuintanillaSánchez Carolina,
TreviñoÁlvarez Andrés Marcelo,
MancillasAdame Leonardo Guadalupe,
GonzálezGonzález José Gerardo
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.756
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1742-1241
pISSN - 1368-5031
DOI - 10.1111/ijcp.13453
Subject(s) - medicine , prediabetes , acanthosis nigricans , insulin resistance , diabetes mellitus , anthropometry , homeostatic model assessment , type 2 diabetes , insulin , pediatrics , endocrinology
Background Insulin resistance (IR) precedes the diagnosis of many metabolic and non‐metabolic illnesses, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Acanthosis nigricans (AN) is a clinical sign associated with IR. However, AN prevalence and diagnostic accuracy in middle‐age adults before or at the time of prediabetes/diabetes diagnosis remain uncertain. Methods With the aim to define AN prevalence and diagnostic accuracy, adults between 40 and 60 years of age were consecutively invited to participate in the study. Participants were categorised into one of two main groups: individuals with normoglycaemia (group 1) and hyperglycaemia (group 2 [ie, prediabetes/diabetes]). Demographic, clinical, anthropometric characteristics, homeostasis model assessment of IR, homeostatic model assessment of β‐cell function, as well as the presence of AN on the neck, axillae, elbows and knuckles were assessed. Results A total of 320 consecutive participants with a mean age of 49.3 years (59.4% women) were included. Overall, AN prevalence was 46.3%, while AN in group 1 and group 2 was 36.3% and 49.6%, respectively ( P = .04). The most common affected sites in group 1 (n = 80) were the knuckles (21.2%) and the neck (17.5%), while in group 2 (n = 240), the neck (29.6%) followed by the knuckles (26.7%). The specificity and positive predictive value of AN for IR were 0.85 and 0.86 in group 1 and 0.90 and 0.96 in group 2, respectively. Conclusions In middle‐age adults, within the entire spectrum of carbohydrate tolerance, AN is highly prevalent and specific. This finding supports its assessment as a reliable and convenient clinical sign of IR. The understanding of AN behaviour through different carbohydrate tolerance strata, and its different locations, could lead to early detection of individuals at high metabolic risk or help direct a more pathophysiological treatment approach in patients with T2DM.