Open AccessEnablers and barriers to the use of antibiotic guidelines in the assessment and treatment of community‐acquired pneumonia—A qualitative study of clinicians’ perspectives
Author(s) -
Sedrak Antoine,
Anpalahan Mahesan,
Luetsch Karen
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
international journal of clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.756
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1742-1241
pISSN - 1368-5031
DOI - 10.1111/ijcp.12959
Subject(s) - medicine , thematic analysis , antimicrobial stewardship , guideline , community acquired pneumonia , qualitative research , pneumonia , stewardship (theology) , family medicine , nursing , antibiotics , antibiotic resistance , social science , pathology , sociology , politics , political science , law , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Summary Background Community‐acquired pneumonia ( CAP ) is a common condition and a number of guidelines have been developed for its assessment and treatment. Adherence to guidelines by clinicians varies and particularly the prescribing of antibiotics often remains suboptimal. Objective The aim of this study was to elucidate potential barriers and enablers to the adherence to antibiotic guidelines by clinicians treating CAP in an Australian hospital. Methods Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with purposively recruited senior prescribers who regularly treat CAP in an Australian hospital. Thematic analysis identified a number of themes and subthemes related to their knowledge, attitudes and behaviours associated with the use of CAP guidelines. Results Thematic saturation was reached after 10 in‐depth interviews. Although similar barriers to the use of guidelines as previously described in the literature were confirmed, a number of novel, potential enablers were drawn from the interviews. Clinicians’ acceptance and accessibility of guidelines emerged as enabling factors. Generally positive attitudes towards antimicrobial stewardship services invite leveraging what was described as the relationship‐based and hierarchical nature of medical practice to provide personalised feedback and updates to clinicians. Conclusions Adding a social and personalised approach of antimicrobial stewardship to policy‐ and systems‐based strategies may lead to incremental improvements in guideline adherent practice when assessing and treating CAP .