Premium
The quality of other assurance services supplied by accounting firms: Evidence from independent expert reports
Author(s) -
Bedford Anna,
Bugeja Martin,
Ghannam Samir,
Ma Nelson
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of auditing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.583
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1099-1123
pISSN - 1090-6738
DOI - 10.1111/ijau.12212
Subject(s) - accounting , audit , business , statutory law , incentive , quality assurance , quality audit , quality (philosophy) , valuation (finance) , actuarial science , marketing , economics , service (business) , philosophy , epistemology , political science , law , microeconomics
Recent concern has been expressed regarding accounting firms reducing the quality of their assurance services (statutory audit and other assurance services) to gain cross‐selling opportunities. While prior studies have focused on the quality of statutory audits, our study examines the quality of other assurance services, in the form of independent expert opinions provided to target firms in Australian takeovers. Specifically, this setting allows us to observe any dissent or consensus in opinions between the accounting firms and their clients regarding the fairness of a takeover offer price, the quality of the independent expert report (valuation range), and fees charged for their services. Our results are inconsistent with accounting firms providing lower quality independent expert reports. However, non–Big 4 accounting firms charge lower fees for their independent expert reports compared to other providers, consistent with potential incentives to cross‐sell future services.